SEATTLE – After a series of leaked prototypes, it's almost a given that Apple Inc. will unveil a new version of the iPhone during its annual software developers conference that opens Monday in San Francisco.
The revelation of a splashy new iPhone would clear up one of the highest-profile Apple mysteries of the year — second to the existence, confirmed in January, of the iPad. Yet it would leave another unknown simmering at Apple, one with far-reaching implications for how we listen to music.
First, let's talk iPhone.
Apple won't comment on its plans, but it has used this conference to launch the last two generations of its smart phone. In April, Gizmodo, a tech blog, paid $5,000 to obtain a working iPhone prototype that was lost by an Apple engineer in a Silicon Valley bar. Apple didn't say the prototype represented the next model of the iPhone, but if the descriptions posted online are accurate, the device will be getting a clearer display, longer battery life and a front-facing camera that could be used for videoconferencing. It's also likely to have the updated iPhone software Apple previewed in April that makes it easier for users to run more than one program at a time.
In another sign Apple is readying a new model, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. in late May halved the price of one kind of the iPhone 3GS, the model that debuted last year, to $97. And as of Monday, AT&T Inc., the sole carrier — at least for now — of the iPhone in the U.S., will stop letting new customers use an unlimited amount of wireless data for a flat fee. Instead, in an attempt to reduce iPhone-driven congestion on its network, AT&T will offer plans that will cost the biggest users of data more money.
It may not make an appearance during CEO Steve Jobs' presentation Monday, but Apple is also likely working on a service that could change the way many of us think about buying and listening to music.
The success of the iPod and the iTunes store has made Apple the world's largest music retailer, but now there's another revolution stirring in the digital song business. As Apple's iPhone and other smart phones became more popular, several new services started sending music over the Internet straight to the devices, letting users skip the step of plugging in and transferring songs from a computer as iTunes still requires. Such services, including Rhapsody and Spotify, which operates in Europe, give people access to just about every song imaginable for a monthly fee.
Forrester Research analyst Sonal Gandhi said these streaming services are still too small to lure Apple into directly competing. But Apple does need to keep an eye on Google Inc., which is building music-streaming technology into its increasingly popular Android phones. Google acquired a company called Simplify Media this year and said in May it plans to build a desktop program that can beam people's iTunes libraries over the Internet to Android phones.
Apple may be cooking up something similar. In late 2009, Apple bought Lala.com, which gave customers a way to listen to songs online, anywhere, if they had already purchased and stored the tracks on their own computer. Lala users could add new songs to their mix, paying 10 cents per song for an unlimited number of plays online or more if they also wanted to download the song to a device. Lala had built an iPhone application, but Apple bought the company before the app was made available to consumers.
Apple shuttered Lala's service in May, and technology analysts believe that was a temporary step before Apple transforms the service into a way for iTunes shoppers to access music from the Web, the iPhone and other Apple devices.
Jobs was asked Tuesday at The Wall Street Journal's "D: All Things Digital" conference about Apple's plans for over-the-Internet access to music and other data, but he didn't show his hand. "There's a lot of things we're working on," he said.
Even if the technology is ready, letting people stream music online — even music they have already paid for — requires new agreements between Apple and recording companies. Apple and the recording labels had general talks about possible plans for Lala several months ago, but there haven't been substantive talks since then, according to executives in the music industry.
___
AP Business Writer Ryan Nakashima in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
PARIS – All Rafael Nadal cares about is winning a fifth French Open championship.
Doesn't matter how he's played until now.
Doesn't matter that he can regain the No. 1 ranking with one more victory.
And, the Spaniard insists, it certainly doesn't matter to him one bit that in Sunday's final, he gets a chance to face the only man he's lost to at Roland Garros, Sweden's Robin Soderling. The tantalizing prospect of a Nadal-Soderling rematch with a Grand Slam title on the line is something for others to ponder.
"I never believe (in) revenge," Nadal said after he and Soderling won their semifinals Friday. "I will be as happy or as disappointed if I lose to Robin or to any other player. I don't think this is going to change the way I'll approach the match."
Perhaps that's true. Still, there's one key stat that won't go away: Nadal boasts a 37-1 career record at the French Open, with Soderling responsible for the lone setback, upsetting the four-time champion in the fourth round a year ago en route to a runner-up finish.
"It's always good to have beaten a player before. I know that I can beat him. I showed it," said Soderling, who knocked off defending champion Roger Federer in the quarterfinals Tuesday. "But, again, every match is a new match, and every match is different."
Friday's two semifinals hardly could have contrasted more.
First came the No. 5-seeded Soderling's grueling, serve-it-and-slug-it victory over No. 15 Tomas Berdych of the Czech Republic, a 6-3, 3-6, 5-7, 6-3, 6-3 test that required 3 1/2 hours. Then came the No. 2-seeded Nadal's far-less-competitive 6-2, 6-3, 7-6 (6) win over No. 22 Jurgen Melzer of Austria.
With the sun shining, and the temperature climbing above 80 degrees, the 6-foot-4 Soderling and the 6-foot-5 Berdych traded big, quick shots. They have similar games, relying mainly on powerful serves — Berdych pounded 21 aces, Soderling 18 — and forehands that zip through the air.
Both were troubled by double-faults at important moments, including Berdych's on a break point that put Soderling ahead 4-2. It was only the sixth game of a match that would contain 48, yet Berdych called that the closest thing to a turning point.
That assessment seems a tad odd, given that Berdych came back to win the next two sets, when Soderling's strokes went awry and he made nearly half his 63 unforced errors.
"Today was really tough to really play my own game because he didn't give me any time at all," Soderling said. "The conditions were much quicker, and he was hitting the ball really hard and really flat."
But Soderling came through. He pounded his right fist on his chest after taking advantage of another double-fault, plus two backhands into the net, by Berdych to lead 4-2 in the fourth set. And in the fifth, with Berdych tiring, Soderling earned a key break point at 3-all with a backhand passing winner.
Soderling swept the last four games, and in the last, he showed he was still fresh, ripping a forehand passing shot down the line while on the run, part of a 33-12 edge in groundstroke winners from the baseline.
When Berdych sailed a backhand wide to close a 15-stroke exchange on match point, Soderling looked on the verge of tears, and he pulled his shirt over his face. Then he sat in his green changeover bench and bowed his head, aware that he'd earned a trip to his second major final.
This is a guy who never had won so much as a third-round match at a Grand Slam tournament until his surprising 2009 showing at Roland Garros, which ended with a straight-set loss to Federer in the final.
"Hopefully," Soderling said, "I won't be as nervous as I was last year."
Nadal would love to forget last year — and not just because of his loss to Soderling. In addition to failing to regain the French Open title, Nadal went through tendinitis in his knees, a problem that limited his movement against Soderling in Paris.
"I was very happy with the win and my run here last year. I still am," Soderling said. "It doesn't matter who I played or who I beat — or if he was injured or not."
Nevertheless, those knees forced Nadal to withdraw from Wimbledon instead of defending his championship there. And then he ceded the No. 1 ranking to Federer, who will give it back if Nadal wins Sunday.
Most bothersome of all was what happened off the court in 2009: Nadal's parents separated.
"Last year," said Toni Nadal, Rafael's uncle and coach, "was very difficult for us."
And these days?
"Different guy," Toni Nadal said. "Rafael now is so much better."
The younger Nadal has won all 21 clay-court matches he's played this season, and all 18 sets he's played at this French Open. If can win again Sunday, he will join Bjorn Borg as the only men with at least five titles at the clay-court Grand Slam tournament. Borg won a record six.
Nadal was asked Friday how his game now stacks up against that of 12 months ago, and he had a ready response.
"Impossible to compare," he said, "because last year I was in the swimming pool in Mallorca."
Against Melzer, Nadal was pretty close to perfect for long stretches.
"It took me awhile to get used to the way he played," said Melzer, who upset No. 3 Novak Djokovic in the quarterfinals and No. 9 David Ferrer in the third round. "For two sets, I think, he was way better. But then, I mean, I kept fighting. I kept my head in there. I tried whatever I could try just to get him a little worried — and I did."
Indeed, only at the very end — or what seemed to be the very end — did Nadal have trouble. Serving for the match at 5-4 in the third set, he missed three consecutive groundstrokes to fall behind love-40. Then Nadal capped what might very well be the worst game you'll ever see him play by double-faulting, hitting a second serve so awkwardly that the ball bounced before it reached the net. Broken to 5-all, Nadal grinned sheepishly.
He later acknowledged he was distracted, figuring the match was all but over. Yes, Nadal was thinking ahead to the final.
But not necessarily thinking ahead to Soderling. Actually, Nadal would have preferred to take on Berdych next.
Why?
"Because," Nadal explained, "I won against him the last six times."
He's lost his last two matches against Soderling. But Nadal won their first three meetings, including a contentious encounter at Wimbledon in 2007. Nadal complained that Soderling didn't say, "Hi" in the locker room. Soderling made fun of the way Nadal tugs at the back of his shorts.
Since then, though, Nadal said Friday, "I didn't have not one problem with him."
Away from the tennis court, anyway.
Asked if there's something special about his nephew getting another crack at Soderling at the French Open, Toni Nadal replied: "No, no, no, no. Not special. It is especially difficult, but not special for us. Because to win Roland Garros is very special, but not the (opponent). It's about winning."